<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhino, BeanShell comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtworker.in/2006/06/28/rhino-vs-beanshell-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtworker.in/2006/06/28/rhino-vs-beanshell-comparison/</link>
	<description>Place to serialize my thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:05:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmack</title>
		<link>http://thoughtworker.in/2006/06/28/rhino-vs-beanshell-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>tmack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.86.205.60/~sachind/?p=23#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Personally, I am in the Rhino camp. One feature I really wished Rhino had: proper subclassing of Java classes.

Currently, subclassing a Java class in Javascript with Rhino either doesn&#039;t work or requires all kinds of hacks.

Other wise, Rhino is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I am in the Rhino camp. One feature I really wished Rhino had: proper subclassing of Java classes.</p>
<p>Currently, subclassing a Java class in Javascript with Rhino either doesn&#8217;t work or requires all kinds of hacks.</p>
<p>Other wise, Rhino is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update on performance of Scripting languages &#171; Thoughtworking&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://thoughtworker.in/2006/06/28/rhino-vs-beanshell-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Update on performance of Scripting languages &#171; Thoughtworking&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.86.205.60/~sachind/?p=23#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] 22nd, 2007 &#183; No Comments  I wrote a post related to Beanshell and Rhino performance comparison about year ago. I received a comment to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 22nd, 2007 &middot; No Comments  I wrote a post related to Beanshell and Rhino performance comparison about year ago. I received a comment to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://thoughtworker.in/2006/06/28/rhino-vs-beanshell-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.86.205.60/~sachind/?p=23#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I watch the Groovy mailing list, and a while back another user did a Groovy/ Rhino comparison:
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8971121&amp;framed=n

Different use case, but interesting since Groovy came out on top.  Surprised all of us :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch the Groovy mailing list, and a while back another user did a Groovy/ Rhino comparison:<br />
<a href="http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8971121&amp;framed=n" rel="nofollow">http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=8971121&amp;framed=n</a></p>
<p>Different use case, but interesting since Groovy came out on top.  Surprised all of us <img src='http://thoughtworker.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
